AI system evaluation
The AIiD program: the single evaluation against the four frameworks. Mapping of uses, intentions, dependencies and weak points. You leave with the Index, the profile and the roadmap.
The methodAI advisory firm
Evaluation, compliance, security
The AI advantage in business comes from usage that is defined, measured, governed and accountable. Your teams gain capability, your exposure drops, your return shows. identifiable evaluates your systems continuously and guides you, from diagnostic to designation.
the AI id framework · profile across six properties
What is it standing on?
The AI id framework makes your AI nameable: a profile across six properties, scored on evidence.
DefinedHow does it know?
The AI Index: a weighted sum where every figure can be reproduced from the inputs.
MeasuredWhat does it answer for?
A targeted roadmap, and at the threshold, the "Responsible AI Organization" designation.
Accountable01 · Defined
Six properties, each scored from 0 to 100 on evidence. The weighting is derived from the four frameworks through an emphasis matrix: it holds up, it is not asserted.
Traceability and accountability for every assisted decision.
AI policy, roles and lifecycle: defined and upheld.
Controls and defences specific to AI risk.
Control over data residency, portability and dependencies.
Human oversight calibrated to risk.
Configurations and results documented and replayable.
02 · Measured
The weighted sum of the six properties places the organization on a scale from 0 to 100, across four posture bands. Most organizations start in the Developing band. A starting point to build from.
Four frameworks that carry different weights, reduced to a single figure: ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF, the AI Act and Law 25 converge in the AI id framework, and the figure is reproducible.
03 · Accountable
0 / 100
Designation awarded this year.
Reference band · Responsible AI Organization 2026
An Index has value only if it holds before a board, a regulator or a client. The AI id framework produces a measurable, traceable figure: every point recalculates from the documented inputs.
The threshold is real: Index ≥ 70 and no property below 60. The designation certifies a governed, accountable state, earned at the threshold.
The AIiD program: the single evaluation against the four frameworks. Mapping of uses, intentions, dependencies and weak points. You leave with the Index, the profile and the roadmap.
The methodAI management system readiness (ISO/IEC 42001), NIST AI RMF alignment, Law 25 compliance. The framework that sustains adoption without freezing team agility.
Our servicesAI literacy, skills transfer, using AI systems at full capacity without exposing the business or its clients. Practical templates grounded in the AI id framework.
Our programsCertificate of completion for the AIiD program, and at the threshold, the "Responsible AI Organization" designation. The seal, accredited by the cabinet, certifies a governed, accountable state, renewed after annual re-evaluation.
The designationA six-property structure (Accountable, Governed, Secure, Sovereign, Supervised, Reproducible) that evaluates an AI system on evidence and produces an Index from 0 to 100, weighted from ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF, the AI Act and Law 25.
No. The AI Index is the measure on which identifiable's certification relies. At the threshold, the cabinet certifies the organization's conformity in AI governance, the NIST AI RMF, and Loi 25, and accredits the « Responsable AI company » designation (« RAI company » mark). For ISO/IEC 42001, the cabinet prepares the organization for certification issued by an accredited body.
identifiable's evaluation program: a single assessment of AI systems and agents against the four reference frameworks that produces the AI Index, the six-property profile and the roadmap. Move 38, whose name comes from the AlphaGo match, is the professional certification of the practitioners who conduct these evaluations: capability was Move 37; responsibility is Move 38.
For organizations whose AI adoption has outpaced their governance. The executive who must answer to their board, the compliance officer exposed to Law 25 and the AI Act, the operations leader who wants AI uses that are nameable, measurable and replayable.
No. The window to put the framework in place is now, before uses harden. The Index maps your posture and shows where to begin. Most organizations start in the Developing band. A starting point to build from.
The most useful first step is the diagnostic, or a thirty-minute discovery call. Scope is defined together; the figure follows from the framing.