Through evaluation, never through purchase. The Responsible AI Practice Program scores each system against the ten properties of the iDIA framework, calculates the AI Index, and applies the threshold. Two conditions, together: the weighted average reaches the overall threshold, and no property falls below the floor.
The floor is what distinguishes the designation from a flattering average. An organization can sit in the Governed band and remain undesignated because two properties falter. Rigour is proven by the cases one refuses to designate.
The case that fails · proof of threshold
AI Index: 67 / 100 · Governed band
Designation: not granted this year.
Two properties below the floor: Accountable (58), Applied (49). The roadmap targets these two gaps first.
Legal notice · precise, by design
The "Responsible AI Practice" mark, accredited by identifiable, attests to the organization's conformity at the end of the Responsible AI Practice Program, according to the iDIA framework (AI governance, NIST AI RMF, Loi 25). For ISO/IEC 42001, the cabinet prepares the organization for the standard, whose audit rests with an accredited body.
ISO/IEC 42001 remains distinct: for it, the cabinet prepares the organization for the standard, whose audit rests with an accredited body. The designation is valid for the year indicated and renewable after re-evaluation. Regulatory correspondences are alignment reference points; precise compliance is confirmed with legal counsel.
An exact claim protects the organization better than a claim that overreaches. The designation is earned at the threshold: an organization can just miss the threshold and see it refused. That is what gives the seal its value.
No. The designation is identifiable's own designation, accredited at the end of the Responsible AI Practice Program, according to the iDIA framework. At the threshold, identifiable attests to the organization's conformity in AI governance, the NIST AI RMF, and Loi 25. ISO/IEC 42001 remains distinct: for it, the cabinet prepares the organization for the standard, whose audit rests with an accredited body.
It is valid for the year indicated on the seal and renewable after re-evaluation. The seal is never displayed after the designation expires.
It receives its AI Index, its profile across ten properties, and a roadmap that targets the gaps in priority order. Re-evaluation is planned once the gaps are addressed. The threshold is real: that is what gives the designation its value.
Read next: the Responsible AI Practice Program, the evaluation · the iDIA framework · the AI Index diagnostic
.png)